<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>befuddled me? &#187; Voucher Diary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.befuddled.me.uk/category/voucher-diary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.befuddled.me.uk</link>
	<description>affiliate marketing for the dazed and confused</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Discount code merchants. Do you want to stand out?</title>
		<link>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/discount-code-merchants-do-you-want-to-stand-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/discount-code-merchants-do-you-want-to-stand-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>befuddle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shop Codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voucher Codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voucher Diary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/discount-code-merchants-do-you-want-to-stand-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Merchants with discount codes expiring 31st August may be missing a trick. A quick glance at my Shop Codes site shows 42 merchants codes are expiring on the last day of the month but only one the day before.
Don&#8217;t you know if you&#8217;re more creative with your expiry dates you&#8217;ll receive more exposure? Many code [...]<p>a</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="-1">Merchants with discount codes expiring 31st August may be missing a trick. A quick glance at my <a href="http://www.shopcodes.co.uk/">Shop Codes</a> site shows 42 merchants codes are expiring on the last day of the month but only one the day before.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">Don&#8217;t you know if you&#8217;re more creative with your expiry dates you&#8217;ll receive more exposure? Many code sites, including my own promote highest the codes that are expiring soon. These are often popular as customers love to bag a bargain before it disappears.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">My statistics show that I sometimes generate more sales for a merchant where the code is about to expire. The reasoning is simple, those merchants are promoted above the fold on the home page and across the site. I typically will put a merchant in this slot up to three days before the promotion is to end.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">So, if you want say free three days promotion over-and-above what you&#8217;re getting already then just stop making your code expire the last day of the month.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">My newer site <a href="http://www.voucherdiary.com">Voucher Diary</a> will concentrate on expiring codes so it will pay even more to stand out and not have a code expire on the same day as 40 other merchants do. I&#8217;m not currently updating that site much but as it&#8217;s returning on page one on Google SERPs I&#8217;m under pressure to start populating it quickly.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">The dates below list the number of merchants with codes expiring on that date.</font></p>
<ul>
<li>14/08 (2)</li>
<li>15/08 (5)</li>
<li>16/08 (1)</li>
<li>17/08 (1)</li>
<li>19/08 (1)</li>
<li>20/08 (3)</li>
<li>21/08 (1)</li>
<li>22/08 (1)</li>
<li>23/08 (1)</li>
<li>24/08 (1)</li>
<li>25/08 (1)</li>
<li>28/08 (1)</li>
<li>29/08 (3)</li>
<li>30/08 (1)</li>
<li>31/08 (42)</li>
</ul>
<p><font size="-1">Now, who wants to have their code expire 27th August instead?</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">Please note that I wouldn&#8217;t want you to take this to the extreme and do what Waterstone&#8217;s do and that is have a code that is valid from 2pm for only 24 hours. I don&#8217;t work to those time frames yet.</font></p>
<p>a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/discount-code-merchants-do-you-want-to-stand-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voucher Diary records first sale</title>
		<link>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/voucher-diary-records-first-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/voucher-diary-records-first-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>befuddle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voucher Codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voucher Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/voucher-diary-records-first-sale/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voucher Diary has recorded its first known sale today. It was made via Google cache on a page that I&#8217;ve subsequently removed.
The sale was for Yes Asia on the Webgains network and the user had searched for &#8220;yes asia coupons&#8221;. I can see from StatCounter that the user was from Singapore and was using Google [...]<p>a</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.voucherdiary.com/">Voucher Diary</a> has recorded its first known sale today. It was made via Google cache on a page that I&#8217;ve subsequently removed.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">The sale was for Yes Asia on the <a href="http://www.webgains.com/">Webgains</a> network and the user had searched for &#8220;yes asia coupons&#8221;. I can see from <a href="http://www.statcounter.com/">StatCounter</a> that the user was from Singapore and was using Google Singapore.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">The reason the page was removed was because I put some draft copy on for the first two days of its soft launch. I then disabled the WordPress posts as I changed the tone of the copy being posted.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">Voucher Diary currently only includes a dozen posts but I am impressed with its position in Google already for some decent search terms. One of the pages is number one for a search phrase that I&#8217;d love my other site <a href="http://www.shopcodes.co.uk/">Shop Codes</a> to be in. As it is, it&#8217;s for a merchant where the code has just expired.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">I&#8217;ve not yet thought of the best approach to handle these expired posts/pages. The nature of Voucher Diary is that the posts will expire as soon as the codes do. That&#8217;s the whole objective &#8211; highlight expiring voucher codes. So I&#8217;ll have a play with that over the weekend.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">Good to see that a sale was made from abroad too and maybe Voucher Diary has opportunity to promote other International merchants.</font></p>
<p>a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/voucher-diary-records-first-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voucher Diary starts to receive Google traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/voucher-diary-starts-to-receive-google-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/voucher-diary-starts-to-receive-google-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>befuddle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shop Codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voucher Codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voucher Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/voucher-diary-starts-to-receive-google-traffic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voucher Diary, the discount code site I soft launched on FaceBook last week has started receiving traffic after being indexed in Google.
Voucher Diary is the third (but not final) stage of my WordPress experiment.
Experiment 1 &#8211; 1234 Codes 
In January I launched 1234codes as a back-up to my Shop Codes content. It was effectively the [...]<p>a</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="-1">Voucher Diary, the discount code site I soft launched on FaceBook last week has started receiving traffic after being indexed in Google.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1"><a href="http://www.voucherdiary.com/">Voucher Diary</a> is the third (but not final) stage of my WordPress experiment.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1"><strong>Experiment 1 &#8211; 1234 Codes </strong></font></p>
<p><font size="-1">In January I launched 1234codes as a back-up to my Shop Codes content. It was effectively the same content but on another domain. I wanted to see how Google compared both sites and in particular the pages. Google preferred 1234codes and the Shop Codes pages were often in the Supplemental index.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1"><strong>Experiment 2 &#8211; Shop Codes &#8211; <em>bite size</em> </strong></font></p>
<p><font size="-1">I then upgraded WordPress but in the process lost my content so I implemented a WordPress blog <strong>within</strong> the Shop Codes site. Calling it &#8216;<a href="http://www.shopcodes.co.uk/bitesize/">Shop Codes &#8211; bite size</a>&#8216; it was the same content but with a different navigation structure and a lot less graphic intensive. Again I could compare how Google treated the <strong>same content</strong> within the same domain.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">During July, Google listed both pages together in the SERPS. If you performed a search for &#8216;Comet&#8217; say, the first result for my site would be the original Shop Codes page and the second indented result would be the &#8216;bite size&#8217; version.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">I then went away on holiday for three weeks and didn&#8217;t perform any site updates. I came back to find that Google had again changed the way it displayed my site in the results. This was at the same time they removed their Supplemental Index.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">This time around the  &#8216;bite size&#8217; pages were getting top billing but the original Shop Codes merchants pages were hidden a little deeper.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">So in both cases it was clear that Google preferred the cleaner build of the WordPress pages rather than my hand crafted own.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">With &#8216;bite size&#8217; I am having template issues, in that it always reverts back to the original design, so I have spent a few evenings searching for the best free designs available, looking for one that will stick.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1"><strong>Experiment 3 &#8211; Voucher Diary </strong></font></p>
<p><font size="-1">Whilst browsing WordPress themes I found two designs that were designed to look like a diary. I&#8217;m sat on several domain names that I&#8217;ve not touched since I&#8217;ve purchased them and so I thought it would be an appropriate time to have a play with &#8216;Voucher Diary&#8217;.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">The focus of &#8216;Voucher Diary&#8217; will be to display codes that are new or about to expire. I&#8217;d not launched this sooner as I don&#8217;t have a CMS but Word Press has a plug-in or two you can use to handle expired posts.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">I launched it with duplicate content to begin with, allowing me time to find a design and category structure I was comfortable with.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">I then looked at the tone of the content and thought best it should be written in a diary style. So I am currently playing with having a male and female <a href="http://www.voucherdiary.com/about/">guest characters</a> updating the content.</font></p>
<p><font size="-1">And that&#8217;s where I am today. I&#8217;ve still got design and content to modify until I&#8217;m satisfied with the final product but it&#8217;s good to see that it is being indexed by Google already.</font></p>
<p>a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2007/08/voucher-diary-starts-to-receive-google-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
