<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Issue over Small Creative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2009/02/big-issue-over-small-creative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2009/02/big-issue-over-small-creative/</link>
	<description>affiliate marketing for the dazed and confused</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2009/02/big-issue-over-small-creative/comment-page-1/#comment-7258</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2009/02/big-issue-over-small-creative/#comment-7258</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ray,</p>
<p>If the only cost to you is £185 per year , it may be time to take a stand and sack the merchant. </p>
<p>Nice little post like sir Alan Sugar</p>
<p>????- Your fired, </p>
<p>you lose £185 but they probably lose a lot more of affiliates and sales.</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadeem Azam</title>
		<link>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2009/02/big-issue-over-small-creative/comment-page-1/#comment-7257</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadeem Azam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2009/02/big-issue-over-small-creative/#comment-7257</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about all the ins and outs of this case, but as a rule of thumb, as long as an affiliate is not using any unauthorised creative, then they should be allowed to use whichever banner size they like on their websites.

It&#039;s a pity affiliates keep getting messed around by a small number of advertisers. These companies are only willing to pay affiliates on a (generally measily) commission basis, yet demand the same control as they would with their salaried employees. 

I admire you for taking your stance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about all the ins and outs of this case, but as a rule of thumb, as long as an affiliate is not using any unauthorised creative, then they should be allowed to use whichever banner size they like on their websites.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pity affiliates keep getting messed around by a small number of advertisers. These companies are only willing to pay affiliates on a (generally measily) commission basis, yet demand the same control as they would with their salaried employees. </p>
<p>I admire you for taking your stance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2009/02/big-issue-over-small-creative/comment-page-1/#comment-7256</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.befuddled.me.uk/2009/02/big-issue-over-small-creative/#comment-7256</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had this in the past, however I understood where the merchant was coming from. The banner mentioned a discount, however with the IAB etc, when someone clicked on the banner, people were sent to the site, before any mention of the T&amp;Cs of the discount.

So to keep all of those people happy who continually whinge about cookie stuffing, I had to point them to another page on my site, that gave all the T&amp;Cs of the discount.

Not sure if your scenario is the same mate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had this in the past, however I understood where the merchant was coming from. The banner mentioned a discount, however with the IAB etc, when someone clicked on the banner, people were sent to the site, before any mention of the T&amp;Cs of the discount.</p>
<p>So to keep all of those people happy who continually whinge about cookie stuffing, I had to point them to another page on my site, that gave all the T&amp;Cs of the discount.</p>
<p>Not sure if your scenario is the same mate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

